Professor Lynn Garner Writes Calculus Book
Hello students! Have you had the wonderful privilege of taking a math class from one of our BYU Professors? If so, then have you had the extra privilege of that math class being one of the Calculus courses taught here? And if that last statement is true, did you take that class since 2002? If not, then you’ve been missing out on a wonderful new experience brought to us by the BYU Math Department. One of our professors, Professor Lynn Garner, http://www.math.byu.edu/~lynng/ has written a Calculus book. And frankly, it’s about time that the ENTIRE BYU Community learns about the contributions he’s made through his book.
This book has literally made waves in the small community of Provo, Utah since it has come into print. I myself have had first hand experience when dealing with the new found features it has in it.
The first and best feature of the book is the hundreds of errors that it has incorporated into the book. No other Math Book I’ve ever used has had this feature. I’ve even used 3 other calculus books before and don’t remember even once having the joyful experience of looking at a list of ‘errata’ and going through on each page of the book to correct the mistakes that were made on each one. You may be thinking to yourself: “What a horrendous thing! I would not wish to go through and correct pages on a book that I paid a significant amount of money for!” I thought so too until I realized what Professor Garner was doing: he was using the errors to make us go through and read the whole book and therefore we would learn more than we would from a book with no errors! Oh what subtle genius it took to write this book.
The next best feature is something that has been done to increase Student/Professor Relationships in the classroom. You see, in all of my previous math books I could go back and read explanations on calculus procedures and look at explanations of what to do and say to myself (I said this inside my head mind you. I had that Saying Inside My Head thing down pat by Sophomore year I’m proud to say) “Oh, now I see, the derivate of sinx = cosx” but with Professor Garner’s book, you can’t do that! With his book, you are instead required to go email your teacher, or call them up at their home and ask them. You might even be forced to ask 1 or maybe even 2 questions in class to further your understanding of Mathematics. Soon with this new system, you will come to know all of your Calculus professors intimately, and will be having Sunday dinner once a month with them and babysitting their kids on weekends, and racquetball every Tuesday and Thursday.
Teachers and students alike have come to love this book. I’ve heard students singing praises in the hallway, praises in the form of, “Oh boy, does this Math book by Professor Garner increase my dependence on learning from class rather than being able to rely on the book!” and teachers saying, “Thank goodness we have this calculus book which is clean and doesn’t contain all that darned cussing that our previous Calculus books had.”
Yes, Professor Garner has gone on to help many people through this book, people like the Bookstore, who cannot buy back used copies of this Calculus book because a new version comes out each year. People like students who used to have no social skills because they could just sit there and learn from a book instead of having to ask other people and students for help, and mostly, people like Bill Gates, by showing that it IS possible to develop a small monopoly, which can’t be governmentally shut down, by requiring all Calculus 1,2, & 3 classes at BYU to use his book. Oh Professor Garner, where would we be without your subtle genius?
This book has literally made waves in the small community of Provo, Utah since it has come into print. I myself have had first hand experience when dealing with the new found features it has in it.
The first and best feature of the book is the hundreds of errors that it has incorporated into the book. No other Math Book I’ve ever used has had this feature. I’ve even used 3 other calculus books before and don’t remember even once having the joyful experience of looking at a list of ‘errata’ and going through on each page of the book to correct the mistakes that were made on each one. You may be thinking to yourself: “What a horrendous thing! I would not wish to go through and correct pages on a book that I paid a significant amount of money for!” I thought so too until I realized what Professor Garner was doing: he was using the errors to make us go through and read the whole book and therefore we would learn more than we would from a book with no errors! Oh what subtle genius it took to write this book.
The next best feature is something that has been done to increase Student/Professor Relationships in the classroom. You see, in all of my previous math books I could go back and read explanations on calculus procedures and look at explanations of what to do and say to myself (I said this inside my head mind you. I had that Saying Inside My Head thing down pat by Sophomore year I’m proud to say) “Oh, now I see, the derivate of sinx = cosx” but with Professor Garner’s book, you can’t do that! With his book, you are instead required to go email your teacher, or call them up at their home and ask them. You might even be forced to ask 1 or maybe even 2 questions in class to further your understanding of Mathematics. Soon with this new system, you will come to know all of your Calculus professors intimately, and will be having Sunday dinner once a month with them and babysitting their kids on weekends, and racquetball every Tuesday and Thursday.
Teachers and students alike have come to love this book. I’ve heard students singing praises in the hallway, praises in the form of, “Oh boy, does this Math book by Professor Garner increase my dependence on learning from class rather than being able to rely on the book!” and teachers saying, “Thank goodness we have this calculus book which is clean and doesn’t contain all that darned cussing that our previous Calculus books had.”
Yes, Professor Garner has gone on to help many people through this book, people like the Bookstore, who cannot buy back used copies of this Calculus book because a new version comes out each year. People like students who used to have no social skills because they could just sit there and learn from a book instead of having to ask other people and students for help, and mostly, people like Bill Gates, by showing that it IS possible to develop a small monopoly, which can’t be governmentally shut down, by requiring all Calculus 1,2, & 3 classes at BYU to use his book. Oh Professor Garner, where would we be without your subtle genius?
23 Comments:
I thought this was cynical and not creative.
Thanks for your comments. I assure you that if you'd even tried to use that book you would recognize what I wrote as 'truth' and not 'cynicism' in the least.
Hi,
I am the sysadmin and head TA for the BYU Math Lab. I respect your opinion and your ability to publish it how you desire, but I wanted to let you know that if you place fliers in the Math Lab they will be removed, because no advertising (other than university service units) is allowed in the Lab. Please feel free to speak freely, but know that your fliers get thrown away when you put them on tables in the lab.
Thought you might like to know.
Cheers,
--
Christian Sieber
BYU Math Lab
i thought the article was so true and brilliant, in fact. I have spent many
lonely nights with that book for Math 112. well, actually, i have spent many
nights with 2 OTHER text books that i use as supplement to actually teach me the
material. isn't that saying something??
It actually makes me laugh about them getting thrown away at the Math Lab - I figured as such - but they did remain there for at least 3 hours or so. I placed them on a table at 7:50 a.m., and I know they were still there later because I went by to check. Sorry to put them where they weren't allowed.
This highlights a problem at BYU: no free speech. Obviously there is no real concern for the students or this book would have been tossed long ago, and when someone tries to get the word out they are warned that they are breaking university policy. That book sucks and Dr. Garner should be ashamed that he his gratifying his pride at the expense of hundreds, if not thousands, of students.
Thank you for your wonderful expression and use of the freedom of speech, i am sure that the founders of the constitution would be very proud to see that you have utilized this amendment to its fullest; where we can speak and not be afraid of repremand. I love your diction and fluency and the pure truth. Because "truth reflects upon our senses"(hymn273). I believe that best books should be identified as ones that departments deem worthy- not department chairs. Thus saith the wisdom of Ashley, the math department is..... I became insane with long intgrals of horrible calculations.
Hmmm. I read it. It's nothing I haven't heard before. Not complete drivel, but not incredibly clever either. Somebody brought several from the math lab to my class, so several students read it. You got a couple smirks, and quite a few agreements. You should be proud of yourself. In fact, I'm sure you are.
Personally, I would like to see non-biased research conducted on Garner's calculus book. In order to validate students claims that this book is a handicap to their education (or a help) I think a pilot program should be started in the math department. A math 112 and 113 class should be formed, and given another calculus book instead of the Garner book. These classes should be taught by a teacher whose previous math 112 or 113 class performed either on or below the math department average on the final exam. At the end of the semester, the performance of these students on the final exam will be compared to others who used the Garner book. This experiment could be repeated as necessary to establish evidence that the book is either a handicap to math education at BYU or a valuable tool. In either case, choosing the best book could significantly lower the demand on the math lab T.A.s since students will have the means to learn most problems independently.
Let me tell you a little story.
I tutored at the Math Lab in 2002, the first semester that the Garner Calculus book was used with Math 112. It was a pain--the first edition, we had no end of complaints about the book, etc. etc. The next semester the book was rolled out for 113. It was still rough, but a few things were noticed. First, yes there were errors and difficult problems in the book which made life difficult for students. However, their brains did not explode trying to understand integration by parts, trig integrals, or power series as did the 113 students last semester. Also as these students started to take upper-division math classes they were much more competent than those who had taken calculus in their high school (which probably used the Larson-Hostetler or the Salas calculus books.)
A past commenter suggested that the university compare the Garner book to another book by having classes run simultaneously. A fair idea, but I can tell you what will happen. The dumber and lazier kids will sign up for the course with the easier book, and learn how to do the problems based on examples. They will do poorly on the final compared to the other kids. This already happened, comparing the kids who took Math 113 with the old book with those who use the new book.
If you want to complain about math books that don't baby you through the concepts then you sure don't want to take Math 371 (or any other high-level math course), which is fundamental for a math degree. I realize that not all people who take Math 112, 113, or 214 are going to be Mathematics majors but I can guarantee you you will need to think critically. This is why your major requires Math 112 instead of 119.
Dr. Garner explains much of this rather well in the preface to his book, as well as at http://www.math.byu.edu/~lynng/StudyingMathUniversity.htm. I would especially refer the reader to the following quote:
"If all you can do is solve text problems, you will be replaced by a computer."
The author also mentions that the book has a lot of errors, etc. This is true. Each edition corrects some errors but there still are many. But look at your other math textbook (or other textbooks for that matter) Which editions are they? Mine are eighth, eighth, and seventh editions. It's the process of writing a textbook. Out of the author's litany of complaints, this is probably the only one worth complaining about.
Is the Garner book perfect? No. Does it teach students mathematics better than the previous book used? Yes. People have similar complaints about courses such as CS 142, American Heritage, etc, but it's all part of a 'college education.'
I find it a little amusing that the author wrote this rant right after complaining about people who don't know how to use computers and need to get babied instead of learning for themselves. It's the same thing, buddy.
To the comment on Dec. 19 10:40: Did I miss something, or is Candid BYU student going to the math lab and asking for help on every single problem in the way that he complained about in his computer article?
For the record: I received an A minus in Math 112H. I never once went to the Math lab to ask any questions of the TAs there. I figured out the problems using three things 1) the lectures in class 2) the examples in the books 3) asking junior & senior level Math majors for help a total number of 2 times when I couldn't figure out how to do various proofs. I didn't pester the Math majors for help until after I had tried to do the proofs by myself for over 40 minutes. The book I used was the big green one which was used previous to Garner’s. It was much better than the current Garner book, and did not coddle me in any way but actually showed decent examples of how to do math.
Math & Science People (IE Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and Math majors) have all been in accordance with me on how horrendous this book is. The majority of these are people who are doing well in their fields, i.e. have over a 3.5 GPA, and are not lazy in the least. Many of these STILL own the calculus book previous to Garner's just because it actually teaches things rather than just giving hard math problems to do in order to prove that students are less proficient than the professors when it comes to doing math.
You sir, Anonymous December 19, 2005 10:40 pm, are the FIRST out of over 20 people who've actually used the book within the last 3 years that think it is a better book than the previous one. As a matter of fact, for more than 17 of these unlazy math people all I said was, "I wrote a flyer about Doctor Garner's calculus book," and before I even mentioned whether I was for or against it, they all gave a variation of the following: "That book? It's TERRIBLE!", and THEN (in case you read this and misunderstand it in the same way you misunderstood the basic gist of this article and the overly dependent students article, when I say 'then' I mean that this next mentioned event took place AFTER the previous event I mentioned) they read the flyer and said, "Oh man, this is SO true!".
On top of that, they (the non-lazy Math & Science Students) all have told me how a lot of their professors (yes PROFESSORS - full fledged professors) have told them that they should go out and buy another calculus book on top of Garner's in order to be able to learn Calculus. As a result most of these students are buying 2 calculus books per semester:
Book 1: a decent calculus book that they can actually learn from.
Book 2: Garner's book, because they HAVE to do the problems from Garner's book in order to get a decent grade, which in turn is because the Professors teaching 112, 113, and 214 HAVE to use this book for their curriculum.
Since they have been buying BOTH books in order to learn calculus, you CANNOT state with authority that using Garner's book has resulted in more competent students.
I guess when you say it's all part of a college education, you mean that a college education includes students learning from this example that if they work hard enough, and eventually become the chair of a college department, they'll be able to write a poorly written book and force students of their university to buy it and thus increase their pocket money.
I'll stop complaining about the book if a decent reason for the enforced use of the book is given, however, not one single decent reason has been put forth as of this date. The only basic reason given so far for using the book is: "Because life is tough. Deal with it." And yes, Anonymous December 19, 10:40 PM, other than you saying that my wishing to be able to use a decent calculus book is comparable to students who NEVER do their own work and only mooch off of the work of others, that is what your comment boils down to, “buddy”.
I couldn't agree more with the complaints about the book. I took calculus in High School, it was a breeze, blew by the AP test and have never looked back. When I took math 214 using Garner's book (I'm an Engineering major) I found myself completely lost and frustrated. Trust me, I'm graduating in June and I have been using Calculus for 4 years now and I can guarantee you that I learned calculus very well from the book that I used in High School. All I can say is that I found myself frustrated and confused MANY times when using the Garner book, and I haven't had that feeling at all after taking Math 334, 343 and 371 using other books that included examples and clear explanations. I'd give my left arm to see the Garner book go away, I think it really is a hinderance to math students.
The book is horrible. I am taking Calculus I right now. I have bought and using two other calculus books to pass this class (these books were recommended the first day of class by the TA). The same concepts are presented in all three books, yet Dr. Garner's is a pain to read and understand. The quality of graphics is of early 1900s. There is no color, the graphs are small and blurry. The binding and paper quality are substandard. Yet, the price is an amazing $100!
I agree with the other students who have complained about the book. I don't think anything is going to change, no matter how much we complain. The school does not care. I have seen the same scenario (horrible book written by a BYU professor gets a new edition out every year) in other departments at BYU. Hundreds of students complain, NOTHING happens. Monopoly, pure and simple.
CD wrote: I don't think anything is going to change, no matter how much we complain. The school does not care. I have seen the same scenario (horrible book written by a BYU professor gets a new edition out every year) in other departments at BYU. Hundreds of students complain, NOTHING happens.
Wrong. Beginning in Spring 2007, BYU will be using _Calculus: Early Transcendentals_ by James Stewart.
One complaint people failed to mention was that the book was huge. It'd break your back if you actually carried it around.
Garner is a loser, always was, always will be. But a damn good speller.
You must realize that even though Professor Garner doesn't understand mathematics and cannot write mathematics, he is not to blame that his book was used by the math (and math ed) departments. Everyone in those departments voted on using the book. The true losers are the members of those departments who voted to use the book.
It's very similar to the situation with George Bush. Don't blame him for being president, blame the less than half of voters who put him in office.
Whiners don't go very far in life. The ones that are successful take advantage of learning opportunities instead of whining about how hard it is.
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
oh Todd, thanks - I always love a self-righteous idiotic preacher, bless your soul ;)
Thank you for this delightful rant. I was a student of Garner's circa 1989-91 and loved his teaching, but hated the textbook we were subjected to.
Jump 20 years, I am Googling reviews of my son's AP Calculus textbook, and trying to refresh my synapses of derivatives and limted expressions. His text didn't get very good reviews either.
Thanks again!
Post a Comment
<< Home